The Escalation of Inflation in China<\/strong><\/p>\n
The Chinese Consumer Price Index (CPI), a chief measure of inflation, rose to a 16-month high in February, up to 2.7 percent from a year ago, which was 1.5 percent in January this year; beating forecasts of 2.3 percent. Additionally, the Producer Price Index (PPI), a major gauge of inflation at the wholesale level, rose 5.4 percent in February from a year earlier, up from January\u2019s 4.3 percent. Inflation now exceeds the 2.25 percent interest rate on 12-month certificates of deposit, raising the risk for policymakers that savers might withdraw their cash from banks and plunge into the already bubbly property market.<\/p>\n
Fertilizer M&A Picks Up <\/strong><\/p>\n
So far Agrium has made attempts to buyout CF Industries, telling shareholders they will drop their bid if CF continues to bid on Terra. Agrium offered CF 5.5 billion USD, or 101 per share. CF quickly declined the offer and shows no interest in being bought out. CF then offered Terra 3.9 billion USD, or 47 per share \u2013 but they were soon outbid by Yara, who upped the offer to 4.1 billion USD, or 41.10 per share. On February 15th<\/sup>, this led Yara and Terra into a merger agreement at Yara\u2019s bid price. The terms leave bidding open for about 30 days, with Terra taking the \u201csuperior proposal\u201d. Sure enough, on March 5th<\/sup>, CF outbid Yara\u2019s offer with a tender of 4.68 billion USD, or 47 per share. This gives Yara 5 business days to make a higher offer. CF Industries CEO said he believes that their offer beats Yara\u2019s for a few reasons including strategic benefits such as swift and effective synergy, along with a faster transaction than Yara is offering.\u00a0 Now sitting on the sidelines, Agrium believed they were the best fit for CF Industries. They have even extended their offer to buy CF until the end of March. Also now on the sidelines is Yara, who says they will \u201cconsider their options\u201d moving forward on whether or not to up the offer for the 4th<\/sup> bid on Terra.<\/p>\n
–A. Tarhini <\/em><\/p>\n
Arthur Laffer: Opinion Piece in WSJ<\/strong><\/p>\n
In an Opinion piece written in the Wall Street Journal in June of 2009, Arthur Laffer wrote:<\/p>\n
\u201cIt’s difficult to estimate the magnitude of the inflationary and interest-rate consequences of the Fed’s actions because, frankly, we haven’t ever seen anything like this in the U.S. To date what’s happened is potentially far more inflationary than were the monetary policies of the 1970s.\u201d<\/p>\n
<\/a>Laffer is most famously recognized for the Laffer curve, an economic model that describes the government revenue as a function of the tax rate charged. In his article he went on to make arguments about the deficit, level of debt and their respective effects on interest rates, taxes and potential\u00a0 partial government defaults. \u00a0His argument is not without merit.\u00a0 From June, 2008 to the present period the money base has increased by 144% and with the recent crises in Greece, Sovereign default is slowly nearing reality. Economists are now questioning the validity of Chairman Bernanke\u2019s decision to keep interest rates at their target level of .25%.<\/p>\n
-R. Belsky<\/em><\/p>\n
Article submitted by: Alex Tarhini, Robert Belsky and Rowena Zacharia of the Capital Markets Lab (CML). To learn more about the Capital Markets Lab (CML) please visit https:\/\/business.fiu.edu\/capital-markets-lab\/<\/a>.<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"